![]() |
| Look at all that potential energy Source: www.nscl.msu.edu |
So that brings me to a question I often dwell on, why isn't nuclear power more prevalent in America? As a country we have finally come to the consensus than fossil fuels are not good for the environment and are now desperately looking everywhere for "green" energy but our search seems to be neglecting nuclear power. We have the technology to make it almost 100% safe and have developed newer types of reactors that don't rely on fissionable material, such as Thorium molten salt reactors (which I'll cover another day.) In my search for answers I will be lucky enough to have sources such as The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the European Nuclear Society to provide information for me to delve in to and there is quite a bit of new research on nuclear physics coming out all the time so I'll never be without data on this subject.
![]() |
| Why aren't we #1? Source: www.euronuclear.org |
I also tend to wonder why we, as a nation, do not use nuclear power as a larger portion of our total energy production like other countries do? I'd also like to find out why nuclear power isn't as popular as coal, natural gas, wind energy, or any of the other "green" energy sources. There has to be a reason why nuclear energy isn't more prevalent in this country.


Nuclear fission isn't exactly green, as massive amounts of energy are needed to produce relatively little amounts of useable power (most of the power, as I understand it, is to keep the reactors cool). Also, the decaying elements produced harming radioactive waste that is impossible to dispose of without the use of a mountain-sized storage facilities.
ReplyDeleteI will concede that aside from properly harnessing solar energy, or developing a way to stabilize fusion reactions, fission is a great source of power compared to any fossil fuel.
I guess when I talk about green energy I'm thinking about energy with a relatively low carbon footprint and by no means do I want to say, or imply, that nuclear power is a renewable resource.
DeleteI do want to explore energy output of a nuclear power plant compared to say a coal or natural gas plant. Obviously a standard U-235 fission reaction puts out significantly more energy than any fossil fuel possibly could, seeing as the fission reaction of U-235 at the scale of 1 atom releases about 200 MeV (with a little math this can be brought up to a more reasonable scale for comparison.) I do think it is important to find out how much of this energy gets out to the "grid" and how much is used to keep the reaction under control.
Every form of energy production will produce some sort of waste product, be it carbon, slowly decaying isotopes or old solar panels. The question of which source of energy is best for this country or the world is simply beyond my understanding.
This is a good, relevant question, and I really like the personal element you included in your post with the Simpsons reference. That goes to show how out of touch most of us are when it comes to nuclear energy. It's just not something we have to think about much, or see in our backyards (yet).
ReplyDeleteAlong with the government sources you listed, you should find good articles in popular magazines and newspapers. See my most recent blog post for a list of such publications by political leaning.